Lawsuit Filed Against the DOJ, FBI, CIA, and NYPD on Behalf of Malcolm X

Today, People’s Law Office attorneys along with lawyers from Ben Crump, Jonathan Moore, and Raymond Hamlin’s offices have filed a lawsuit against the United States Government, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Central Intelligence Agency, and the New York Police Department on behalf of the estate of Malcolm X. The lawsuit alleges these entities played a significant role in the events leading to Malcolm X’s assassination and engaged in a decades-long cover-up to shield their involvement from the public.

According to the complaint, U.S. government agencies and the NYPD were aware of serious, credible threats to Malcolm X’s life and failed to intervene, allowing the tragic assassination to take place on February 21, 1965. It asserts that these entities, under the direction of J. Edgar Hoover, then-head of the FBI, went beyond mere allegedly illegal surveillance of Malcolm X, actively conspiring to reduce his protection and leaving him vulnerable to an attack they knew was imminent.

For decades, these agencies viewed Black activism as a threat to national security, resulting in the unchecked targeting of prominent leaders, including Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Marcus Garvey. This lawsuit seeks accountability for the systemic negligence and intentional actions that deprived Malcolm X’s family and the world of his life and legacy.

According to the lawsuit, the FBI and CIA collaborated with undercover agents within the Nation of Islam. Despite knowing the gravity of the threats, the FBI failed to protect Malcolm X, instead actively compromising his safety by arresting his security team days before his assassination, removing security officers from the ballroom where he was killed, and not approving permits allowing him to purchase a firearm.

The estate’s lawsuit includes the following allegations:

  • The NYPD and federal agencies were aware of imminent threats but failed to safeguard Malcolm X’s life.
  • The NYPD and federal agencies removed security personnel from the ballroom, reducing his protection.
  • Federal and local agencies allegedly encouraged the assassination and directly facilitated conditions that made it possible.
  • Federal agents, including undercover operatives, were in the ballroom during the assassination and took no steps to intervene.
  • After the assassination, a coordinated effort was made to conceal the involvement of these agencies, preventing the Shabazz family from seeking justice in court.

“This cover-up spanned decades, blocking the Shabazz family’s access to the truth and their right to pursue justice,” said Attorney Ben Crump. “We are making history by standing here to confront those wrongs and seeking accountability in the courts.”

The lawsuit details nine causes of action, which include excessive use of force against Malcolm X, deliberate creation of danger, failure to protect, and the denial of access to the courts for Malcolm’s family. It also charges the defendants with conspiracy, fraudulent concealment, and wrongful death.

Click here to read the full complaint.

PLO Lawyers Filed a Civil Rights Lawsuite on Behalf of a Doordash Driver Tased by Superior Police During a Routine Traffic Stop

Yesterday, attorneys for Ian Cuypers, a DoorDash driver who was brutally attacked and tased by Superior Police Department officers during a routine traffic stop, have filed a multi-count federal civil rights lawsuit seeking damages against the City of Superior and multiple SPD officers.

As alleged in the complaint, on February 28, 2024, 22-year-old Cuypers was driving for DoorDash when he accidentally made a wrong turn down a one-way street. Justin Taylor, a probationary SPD officer who had finished field training just two days prior, initiated a traffic stop. Cuypers pulled over immediately, but Taylor nevertheless called for backup and four other SPD officers responded. Taylor and two other officers pointed their firearms at Cuypers, despite lacking any basis to believe that Cuypers was armed or posed a threat or that he had committed anything more than a minor traffic violation. Cuypers complied with the officers’ commands to exit the vehicle and back towards them with his hands up, but the officers continued to unnecessarily escalate the situation, shouting aggressive, at-times conflicting commands. One of the officers, Taylor Gaard, then tased Cuypers in a completely unjustified use of force despite the fact that Cuypers had his hands in the air and posed no threat to the officers or anyone else. Cuypers suffered excruciating pain and was terrified that the officers would kill him.

Afterwards, the officers arrested Cuypers and joked about completing his DoorDash delivery and going viral on TikTok. Taylor tried to cover up the officers’ wrongdoing by citing Cuypers for resisting or obstructing a police officer. A jury acquitted Cuypers of that charge on July 16, 2024.

The incident was captured on body cam, which received hundreds of thousands of views online.

“The officers’ unreasonable escalatory tactics and excessive use of force on an unarmed and non-threatening DoorDash driver who made a simple driving error is shocking and outrageous,” stated Nora Snyder of the People’s Law Office, one of Cuypers’s lawyers. “The officers’ brutality had and continues to have a profoundly damaging effect on Mr. Cuypers’s life.”

Cuypers stated, “This incident was the scariest thing that has ever happened to me. I thought I was going to be killed, and the officers treated it like a big joke. I’m bringing this lawsuit to hold them accountable and to show that it’s not OK for police to treat people the way they treated me.”

The federal civil rights lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. Cuypers is represented by Attorneys Nora Snyder, Ben Elson, and Brad Thomson with the People’s Law Office based in Chicago. The People’s Law Office has been defending its clients’ constitutional rights and fighting against police violence since 1969.

A copy of the complaint and the videos are available here.

Read more about this case on the Northern News Now.

Stop spending millions on ‘pinstripe patronage’ to defend police torture, wrongful conviction lawsuits

The money that’s been spent to defend these lawsuits is staggering: $750 million by Chicago, according to one analysis.

By Flint Taylor

This oped was in the Chicago Sun-Times on Sept 27, 2024.

In the last few months, two separate Chicago juries returned record verdicts in two wrongful conviction cases. On Sept. 9, a federal court jury returned a $50 million verdict in favor of Marcel Brown, a Black man who was wrongfully convicted and spent nearly 10 years in prison on the basis of a coerced confession and other fabricated evidence. The city, whose settlement offer was reportedly $3 million, was represented by private lawyers who, along with several other defense firms, have collected $150 million of “pinstripe patronage” for decades from the city for representing police officials in police torture and other wrongful conviction cases

in August, another federal jury returned a $22.5 million verdict in favor of the estate of William Amor, who was wrongfully convicted of an arson-murder and spent more than 20 years in prison on the basis of a false confession that was coerced from him by Naperville detectives. Naperville subsequently settled the case for $25.5 million. And on Sept. 18, City Council approved a $10.6 million settlement in favor of Anthony Jakes, who was tortured by detectives working under the notorious Jon Burge and spent 20 years in prison. In these two cases, the defendants were represented by a longtime “pinstripe” lawyer who had defended Burge himself in several earlier torture lawsuits. In the Jakes case, Chicago paid an additional $2.25 million to its pinstripe team.

These awards highlight long-standing, systemic problems that have continued under Mayor Brandon Johnson and his corporation counsel. Johnson campaigned on a platform that condemned police torture and wrongful convictions, and promised fair compensation to its victims. Civil rights lawyers proposed a new approach that would rid the city of the “pinstripe” lawyers while creating a mediation process that would be employed early in the litigation and apply fair monetary ranges for wrongful conviction and other police violence cases.

To date, 18 months after Johnson took office, the mayor and his top lawyer have refused to implement this or any other reform. Instead, they have continued “business as usual,” with catastrophic results.

In the Burge cases, the same pinstripe lawyers continue to implement their “bill and obstruct” game plan, denying in court what mayors, including Johnson, and numerous politicians have publicly admitted: that the Chicago Police Department had long-standing practices of torture leading to wrongful convictions, fostered by a pervasive code of silence.

A ‘staggering’ amount of money
Redoubling their previous efforts, these lawyers recently moved to recuse the only Black federal judge who, in the past 35 years, has been assigned to sit on the score of torture cases that have wended their way through the local federal courts. After the judge rejected the motion, the corporation counsel personally authorized an appeal that was summarily rejected by the higher court.

In the Jackie Wilson case (I am one of Wilson’s lawyers) a criminal court judge had ruled that Jackie and his brother Andrew had been brutally tortured by Burge and several of his detective crew, including Thomas McKenna. During the criminal proceedings that resulted in the judge’s determination that Jackie was innocent, McKenna and Burge wisely took the Fifth Amendment. But McKenna, now represented by another firm of “pinstripe lawyers,” has flaunted the judicial finding that he tortured Wilson, and denied under oath in Wilson’s civil case that he did so.

The money that Chicago, Cook County, and the state have expended over the past two decades in Burge torture and wrongful conviction cases is staggering. According to public records, Chicago has paid $49.25 million to outside lawyers; $118.75 million to survivors of police torture; and another $50.5 million in pensions to Burge (now deceased) and his confederates, for a total of $218.5 million. Additionally, the county has paid $40 million, and the state $10 million, for a grand total of $268.5 million.

The total payouts made by Chicago alone in all wrongful conviction cases, according to a study recently released by the Truth Hope and Justice Initiative, is three-quarters of a billion dollars: $600 million to the victims and $150 million going to the consortium of pinstripe lawyers.

The city, the mayor and the corporation counsel are now at a very public financial crossroads. Scores of pending torture and other wrongful conviction cases remain to be resolved. A continued “head in the sand” approach could cost the taxpayers many times more than if they — the mayor and corporation counsel — wake up, smell the coffee, and institute reforms that will result in a fair, speedy, and equitable resolution of these cases, for both the victims and the taxpayers.

Lawsuit Filed Against the City of Chicago and Home Depot

On August 6, 2024, People’s Law Office lawyers Flint Taylor and Ben Elson joined with Raise the Floor and Workers Law Office lawyers to file a 17 count complaint on behalf of four Venezuelan and one Columbian day laborers (journaleros), and the Latino Union alleging that off duty Chicago Police officers, “moonlighting” as security officers at the Western and 47th Street Home Depot, with racial animus and using their power as CPD officers, together with Home Depot officers, brutalized the workers and detained, arrested and prosecuted them on bogus charges. The suit also centers long-standing CPD policies, practices and customs, specifically as they encourage this unconstitutional use of force and unlawful arrests, by failing to properly supervise, control and discipline officers who use their police powers while they are working secondary employment.

Read more about this case on City Bureau

JOINT STATEMENT ON BEHALF OF JACKIE WILSON BY HIS LAWYERS

Today the Cook County Board unanimously approved a record-setting $17 million dollar settlement to compensate Jackie Wilson for their prosecutors’ role in his torture and 36 years of wrongful incarceration. This is a capstone to the People’s Law Office (PLO) for more than 35 years of struggle against Chicago police torture and cover-up. Unfortunately, the Johnson administration continues to shirk its responsibility for this horrendous miscarraige of justice by continuing to fund private lawyers, who have already collected tens of millions of dollars, to deny the City of Chicago’s paramount responsibility for Jon Burge and the City’s pattern and practice of torture and cover-up in Jackie and numerous other police torture cases. The PLO and Loevy and Loevy have issued the following statement:

JOINT STATEMENT ON BEHALF OF JACKIE WILSON BY HIS LAWYERS

March 13, 2024

“As the Cook County courts recognized when granting a certificate of innocence, Jackie Wilson was wrongfully convicted of a senseless and horrific crime. During his 36 years of wrongful imprisonment, Jackie suffered unimaginable pain and trauma that few people could ever truly understand. With this settlement, Cook County acknowledges and limits the substantial risk that this litigation poses to taxpayers while also allowing Jackie to move forward with what remains of his life.

Now it is time for the City of Chicago to likewise appreciate the serious exposure it faces in this case and act consistently with the promises of Mayor Johnson and his predecessors who have long acknowledged the serious harm that Jon Burge and other Chicago police torturers have inflicted upon Jackie, other torture survivors, and Chicago’s communities of color.”

THE PEOPLE’S LAW OFFICE and LOEVY AND LOEVY

An Interview with Longtime PLO Attorney Michael Deutsch

To read the full interview on Hardcrackers.com click here.

On Political Repression: A Hard Crackers Discussion with Michael Deutsch

John Garvey and Mike Morgan — March 6, 2024

Michael Deutsch is an experienced human rights attorney in the U.S., perhaps one of the most veteran and well-informed lawyers at that extremely difficult craft in this country.  Michael graciously allowed us at Hard Crackers to pick his brains and share some of his experiences with us. To give you some idea of Michael’s journey down that road, here are some of the important things he has done:

Michael Deutsch has been a lawyer with the People’s Law Office and a Guild member since 1970. From 1991-1996 he was the Legal Director of the Center for Constitutional Rights.

Michael’s legal career has been devoted to the representation of political activists and political prisoners. He was one of the criminal defense lawyers for the rebelling Attica prisoners, a coordinator of the Attica Brothers Legal Defense, and one of the class counsel in the Attica civil suit which, after two decades of litigation, resulted in a 12 million dollar settlement.

 He was attorney for the five Puerto Rican Nationalist prisoners imprisoned in the 1950’s who won an unconditional sentence commutation from President Carter in 1979, and represented Puerto Rican independentistas in Chicago, New York and Hartford who were charged with seditious conspiracy, the Wells Fargo expropriation, and subpoenaed before federal grand juries. He also helped to develop the “Prisoner of War” claim under international law for Puerto Rican prisoners.

Michael has defended Black Panthers, Black prisoners facing the death penalty, and was part of the legal team that challenged the first use of the high security “control units” for men at Marion Federal Prison and for women at Lexington Federal Prison.

More recently, Michael successfully defended Chicago Palestinian community activist Muhammad Salah charged with Terrorism and RICO as well as Palestinian community organizers targeted by the FBI and subpoenaed to a federal grand jury. 

Also more recently, Michael represented Rasmea Odeh, the deputy director of the Arab-American Action Network (AANN), a former Palestinian political prisoner and torture survivor, who had been charged with providing false information on her naturalization application, nine years after she had received her citizenship. She was stripped of her US citizenship and after months of litigation was deported to Jordan and now resides in Ramallah.

Michael Deutsch has written and lectured extensively on prisons, international human rights, and political repression.

People’s Law Office Sues Sheriff Tom Dart for Violating the First Amendment

March 6, 2024

Chicago, IL — Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart illegally banned students Ethan Ostrow and Harley Pomper from Cook County Jail in retaliation for speaking out. Ostrow and Pomper are students at University of Chicago who facilitated creative writing workshops at the jail for two years. In May 2023, they published an Op-Ed arguing that Cook County Jail’s paper ban infringes on intellectual freedom.

After Ostrow and Pomper published the opinion piece, their security clearance was denied, preventing them from participating in the creative writing program the following school year. Sheriff Dart was the person ultimately responsible for the decision to have their clearance denied, according to the lawsuit.

This morning, Ostrow and Pomper sued Sheriff Dart for violating their First Amendment rights.

“We, and everyone who works or lives in the jail, have a right to speak without fear of retaliation,” said Ethan Ostrow. “We engaged in public dialogue about a policy of great public concern, impacting the lives and livelihoods of thousands of people. But this public debate breaks down when powerful people like Sheriff Dart retaliate against critics. Retaliation is an attempt to scare people into silence.”

“The First Amendment forbids government officials from punishing people for their speech,” said Attorney Brad Thomson of the People’s Law Office. “Sheriff Dart had my clients banned from volunteering at the jail simply because he disagreed with their viewpoint. Sheriff Dart’s actions are a flagrant violation of the Constitution, raising serious concerns about whether he is respecting the Constitutional rights of the people he is incarcerating at Cook County Jail.”

“Sheriff Dart banned us because we spoke out,” said Harley Pomper. “But this retaliation pales in comparison to the extremely common, far more severe retaliation against people in jail. Right now, Sheriff Dart is responsible for jailing 4,681 Chicagoans. The health and wellbeing of the people incarcerated by Sheriff Dart is part of the health and wellbeing of our city. The people inside, and people who provide services, need to be able to demand livable conditions, medical care, and, yes, access to paper without fear of retaliation.”

The complaint is available here and the original op-ed written by Ostrow and Pomper is available here.

People’s Law Office is a civil rights law firm based in Chicago that has been defending their clients’ Constitutional rights and fighting against police violence, wrongful convictions, and governmental abuses of power since 1969. 

People’s Law Office Attorneys Join the Pursuit for Justice for the Family of Malcolm X

Yesterday, attorneys from the People’s Law Office joined attorney Ben Crump to introduce new witnesses and evidence to the alleged conspiracy case surrounding Malcolm X’s assassination.

Malcolm X was assassinated on February 21, 1965, at age 39 while speaking at the Audubon Ballroom. He was shot a total of 21 times by a group of men in front of his wife and daughters. The connection between his death and federal and New York government agencies, including the NYPD, FBI, and CIA has long been alleged. It has recently been revealed that these governmental agencies possessed crucial factual and exculpatory evidence about their knowledge and involvement that they fraudulently concealed from the family of Malcolm X and the men who were wrongfully convicted of crimes surrounding the assassination of Malcolm X.

The People’s Law Office is committed to the continuing pursuit of justice for the family of Malcolm X and the continuing efforts to uncover the full truth about the assassination and its cover-up.

Follow the links below to hear more about this case.

Press Conference Feb, 21, 2024

Malcolm X Assassination: Former Security Guards Reveal New Details Pointing to FBI, NYPD Conspiracy

Lawyers for Malcolm X family say new statements implicate NYPD, feds in assassination

People’s Law Office Files Wrongful Conviction Lawsuit in Minnesota on Behalf of Thomas Rhodes

On the one-year anniversary of his release from prison, Thomas Rhodes filed a federal civil rights lawsuit in Minneapolis, Minnesota, seeking accountability and compensation for the nearly 25 years he spent wrongfully imprisoned for his wife’s tragic accidental death in 1996.

Rhodes, represented by the People’s Law Office in Chicago, and the Law Office of Tim Phillips in Minneapolis, has brought this suit alleging that the defendants fabricated evidence and conspired to have him wrongfully convicted of murder.

The defendants in this lawsuit include former Ramsey County, Minnesota Medical Examiner Michael McGee, who has faced scrutiny for his questionable conduct in several wrongful convictions.

Mr. Rhodes was convicted of first-degree and second-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison in 1998, based on fabricated evidence and testimony manufactured by the defendants in the case. He was released from prison nearly 25 years later, on January 13, 2023, through the legal assistance of the Great North Innocence Project.

The complaint alleges that the defendants conspired to falsely implicate Mr. Rhodes in his wife’s accidental drowning death at a lake in Kandiyohi County, Minnesota. It details how McGee and a Patrol Captain for the Hennepin County, Minnesota Sheriff fabricated unsupported conclusions in reports and gave false testimony stating the death was a premeditated homicide, despite all scientific evidence to the contrary. Additionally, the complaint alleges that Kandiyohi County Attorney Boyd Beccue also secretly met with McGee to help manufacture a case against Mr. Rhodes.

Ten separate forensic pathologists reviewed the medical evidence and disagreed with McGee’s finding that the death was a homicide, yet Mr. Rhodes was convicted and sentenced to life in prison based on the fabricated evidence. He steadfastly maintained his innocence while imprisoned until January 2023, when his convictions were finally vacated after an investigation by the Minnesota Attorney General’s Office’s Conviction Review Unit determined the evidence was unreliable.

“Thomas Rhodes is an innocent man who lost nearly 25 years of his life due to these defendants conspiring to falsely implicate him for the accidental death of his wife,” said attorney Brad Thomson of the People’s Law Office in Chicago. “Over two decades in prison caused unfathomable harm and injustice. With this lawsuit, we intend to bring the defendants’ egregious misconduct to light and seek the measure of justice still owed to Mr. Rhodes.”

Mr. Rhodes has spent the past year adjusting to life outside of prison, stating, “I have gained my freedom. I now look forward to justice.”

The federal civil rights lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota in Minneapolis. Mr. Rhodes is represented by People’s Law Office attorneys Brad Thomson, Ben Elson and Flint Taylor, with the assistance of People’s Law Office Fellow Tayleece Paul, and attorney Tim Phillips of the Law Office of Tim Phillips in Minneapolis.

A copy of the complaint is available here: Rhodes Complaint

30 PLUS YEARS OF PLO PERSISTENCE CONTRIBUTES TO THE FREEDOM OF RONNIE CARRASQUILLO

Ronnie Carrasquillo, a longtime client of PLO, was recently released after serving 47 years in prison. 65 year old Ronnie emerged from prison having been an inspirational mentor and peace-maker to so many both inside and outside the prison walls since his incarceration when he was 18 years of age. Over the years he had garnered wide-spread support, from his family, religious and Puerto Rican communities, elected and appointed officials and even the former prosecutor in his underlying case. An instructor in the prison described Ronnie, his student, as sincere and honest with an excellent attitude, having helped turn many other people’s lives around. The courtroom was packed with his supporters when Judge Maldonado, having been ordered by the appellate court to conduct a new sentencing hearing, declared his time had been served and he was rehabilitated. All who know Ronnie are eager to see the positive contributions Ronnie will continue to make in his community.

In 1976, 18 year old Ronnie was living in Humboldt Park, a community saturated with racially based violence. His mother had died three years before and he and his brother were left largely to fend for themselves amidst the chaos of their lives. He himself had been shot and the victim of multiple crimes. One night after drinking at a party, a fight broke out between Puerto Rican and white gangs in the street below and as the party-goers streamed out, Ronnie was handed a gun and he fired it several times attempting to fire over the crowd to disperse the fight. Shots ended up high up in the first and second floors of an abandoned building but one shot struck an off duty police officer, dressed in jeans and a leather jacket, who was in the midst of the crowd trying to break-up the melee, killing him. As the prosecutor attested Ronnie always took responsibility for firing the gun, was saddened and expressed his remorse from the beginning. Despite his lack of a criminal record, Judge Frank Wilson sentenced Ronnie to 200-600 years in prison.

Approximately 31 years ago PLO partner Michael Deutsch received a call from Ronnie Carrasquillo’s brother and later learned that Ronnie had been involved with the Puerto Rican Cultural Center, a community organization that the office had long supported in the Humboldt Park neighborhood. Thus began Michael’s and the PLO’s decades long commitment and support of Ronnie. Ronnie’s story was compelling as was the involvement of Judge Wilson who was implicated in a  judicial corruption scandal in which he was was accused of taking a bribe to acquit a mob hit man several months before giving the draconian sentence to 18-year-old Ronnie. Judge Wilson later killed himself as an indictment of him appeared imminent.   

Michael enlisted his PLO partner John Stainthorp who was also dealing with an appeal of a man wrongly sentenced by a corrupt judge. Thus began Michael’s lead advocacy through multiple criminal appeals, successive post conviction hearings, chancery proceedings and multiple parole hearings. Over the course of the next 30 years Michael zealously represented Ronnie. Michael repeatedly represented Ronnie in parole hearings only to see the hearing room packed with police officers, intimidating parole board members and leading a former chair of the board to conclude that Ronnie would never be granted parole. At times when he deemed it advantageous to Ronnie’s case he recruited, encouraged and supported other attorneys to take up aspects of the fight to free Ronnie. Ronnie’s case became one of the examples of a deteriorating parole board that now is in disarray and stacked against those who believe in rehabilitation and second chances.

After a successful appeal, that instead of concluding the outrageous sentence received was the result of a corrupt judge, found that the requisite cause and prejudice was established and granted leave to file a successive post conviction petition on behalf of Ronnie. The appellate court found prejudice in that Ronnie, without any prior criminal record who was 18 at the time of the  crime, had already served a de facto life sentence and despite his excellent prison record and strong family and community support had been turned down for parole 30 times in almost as many years. Former PLO associate Shubra Ohri and Michael tried a postconviction hearing in front of Judge Maldonado and then successfully appealed the judge’s denial of relief. PLO partner Brad Thomson, a law student at the time, conducted legal investigation into aspects of the case and testified at the hearing.

In 2020, Michael procured a forensic evaluation from  a forensic clinical psychologist who provided an expert report regarding the still developing brain of an 18 year old emerging adult, concluding that many of the factors recognized by the US Supreme Court in Miller v. Alabama were applicable to Ronnie and the likelihood of his rehabilitation based on his stellar prison record. At the same time, Michael enlisted PLO partner Jani Hoft along with Attorney Melinda Power to assist with a concurrent attack in Chancery Court of Cook County of the unconstitutionality of Ronnie’s repeated mistreatment by the parole board. Michael, Jani and Melinda also conducted another postconviction hearing in front of Judge Maldonado only to have the judge again deny Ronnie any relief concluding that despite the evidence to the contrary that Ronnie had the continued opportunity for parole.            

In the meantime, Illinois Prison Project attorney Jennifer Soble had taken up efforts to secure parole as well as clemency for Ronnie, tirelessly fighting on his behalf. Former PLO partner Chick Hoffman, semi-retired senior attorney with the Office of the State Appellate Defender took up Ronnie’s appeal, successively arguing the case and ultimately resulting in a reversal of Judge Maldonado’s denial of Ronnie’s postconviction petition, finally vacating the 200-600 year sentence and ordering a new sentencing hearing be conducted.  Ronnie’s case again came before Judge Maldonado and despite vicious and unfounded vitriol against Ronnie on social media by the Chicago Chapter of the Fraternal Order of Police, the Office of the State’s Attorney raised no objection and Judge Maldonado sentenced Ronnie to time served and released him to his supportive family and community. Michael, Chick and Jennifer Soble were there to  finally see Ronnie set free. All of us at the PLO celebrate this long awaited result and wish Ronnie and his family the very best for the future.